|
Posted by: thepinetree on 05/30/2023 06:36 PM
Updated by: thepinetree on 05/30/2023 06:36 PM
Expires: 01/01/2028 12:00 AM
:
Why I Support the Fiscal Responsibility Act. ~ Congressman Tom McClintock
Washington, DC...In 2011, Congress faced an impasse on raising the debt limit. It was the first year of a new Republican House majority and the third year of a spendthrift Obama administration.
It’s a myth that the impasse caused Standard and Poors to downgrade the nation’s Triple-A credit rating. S&P had warned explicitly for months that Congress had to reduce its projected deficit by $4 trillion over ten years, or face a credit downgrade. Congress responded with the Budget Control Act, which suspended the debt limit and cut the projected deficit by less than half that amount. Standard and Poors promptly made good on its threat.
I voted against the Budget Control Act because it failed to preserve the nation’s triple-A credit rating. It seemed clear at the time.
Nevertheless, the BCA turned out to be the most meaningful – indeed, the only – true constraint on federal spending in the years that immediately followed. Although it made disappointingly small cuts in current spending, it included an across-the-board sequestration mechanism that kicked in automatically when Congress failed to enact the targeted deficit reductions.
In the years that followed, I found myself defending the BCA’s sequestration provisions from bi-partisan efforts to bypass them. My vote against the BCA became the one I most regret over 15 years serving in Congress. True, it didn’t do enough to preserve our credit. But it did more to constrain federal spending than any other act since then.
I’m not going to repeat that mistake with the new agreement.
Like the BCA, there’s a lot for Republicans not to like in the Fiscal Responsibility Act. For openers, like the BCA, it only reduces current spending slightly, by clawing back tens of billions of dollars of unspent covid funds and other recissions. It’s a pittance compared to the unsustainable run-up in spending during the covid hysteria.
Like the BCA, this agreement suspends the debt limit until after the next election – perhaps as much as $4 trillion. That’s excessive, but the debt is not the problem. The debt is a direct result of over-spending. Once government has spent a dollar, the only choice is to raise taxes, print money, or borrow. In short, it’s the spending, stupid.
That’s the fine point of the matter. Like the BCA, the FRA places real constraints on future spending, making it the most important victory for fiscal conservatives in more than a decade. This agreement puts in place changes that will confine spending growth to one percent a year for the next six years if done by appropriation (the 12 annual spending bills) – and requires a one percent reduction if done by continuing appropriation (the omnibus abominations).
It will reduce welfare spending by increasing the work requirements for able bodied adults collecting SNAP and TANF benefits. By reducing environmental reviews to two years, it sets the stage for increased energy production, new water storage and forest management, highway construction – in fact, every infrastructure project now delayed by endlessly time consuming and ultimately cost-prohibitive environmental reviews. It will constrain future regulatory costs imposed by the executive agencies by subjecting them to offsetting regulatory savings. It prevents the administration from adding abusive IRS agents in the coming year. If the Supreme Court rules against the President’s arbitrary student loan forgiveness, as anticipated, it prevents the President from circumventing it by pausing repayments indefinitely. That’s nearly a trillion dollars in taxpayer savings right there.
Republicans shouldn’t compare it to the perfect. Our system of government was never designed to make perfect legislation. They shouldn’t compare it to the Limit, Save and Grow Act that was negotiated and agreed to solely among House Republicans. With both a Senate and President of decidedly different views, the outcome is always going to be a disappointment compared to what a purely-Republican bill would do.
Republicans should instead compare it to the alternative.
Clearly, this administration intends to use a failure to increase the debt limit in the most destructive way that it can, in a calculated effort to create panic in credit rating agencies and capital markets and then push through ruinous measures of their choosing. Events will unfold very quickly, and in a state of financial and political panic, the enormous gains made possible by this bill will be swept away.
If we are going to save our country, Republicans need to get a lot worse at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Passing the FRA would be a good start and set the stage for additional victories to come.
|
| Comments - Make a comment |
| The comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for its content. We value free speech but remember this is a public forum and we hope that people would use common sense and decency. If you see an offensive comment please email us at news@thepinetree.net
Fiscal Responsibility
Posted on: 2023-05-30 18:54:55
By: Anonymous
|
|
When the Republicans -Reagan, Bush, trump and the illegal wars are accounted for, according to the CBO, OMB report,2023, this is the cause of the Federal Debt.
The Republicans demanded and got IRS defunding in this bill, that's' more fiscal responsibility according to ole tommy boy.
What a twisted mind the GOP cons have, very sick.
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility
Posted on: 2023-05-30 19:02:40
By: Anonymous
|
|
Vs the Dems? They just want the Govt to steal from their neighbors and give it to them.
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility
Posted on: 2023-05-30 19:49:27
By: Anonymous
|
|
Nice to know Tom. DC was a sh!thole 12 years ago and with your leadership it remains a sh!thole.
In those 12 years as you note, you've been completely ineffective in changing the direction of this country and this district.
We honestly don't give a good god damn what you think Tom.
Time for you to go.
In the meantime just STFU.
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility
Posted on: 2023-05-30 22:09:30
By: Anonymous
|
|
Tom McClintock is as stable as Chinese concrete.
Shame on us for voting for him. Shame on him for not stepping down.
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility
Posted on: 2023-05-31 06:58:44
By: Anonymous
|
|
Fuk Tom and anyone who votes for him.
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility
Posted on: 2023-05-31 07:32:36
By: Anonymous
|
|
Fuk yourself little dick, Tom's the Greatest
[Reply
]
|
No Subject
Posted on: 2023-05-31 07:01:39
By: Anonymous
|
|
The party of George Santos, Misery Taylor Green. Have no credibility… GET REAL
[Reply
]
|
Re:
Posted on: 2023-05-31 07:04:38
By: Anonymous
|
|
Has Kevin McCarthy ever been to Bakersfield California ? Trump would call it a shi- hole country.
[Reply
]
|
Re:
Posted on: 2023-05-31 07:08:18
By: Anonymous
|
|
Nothing like some good old book fashioned burning in Florida. Racism capital of the UNITED STATES. VACATION… Fuc-ing Never
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility...nice to know
Posted on: 2023-05-31 08:26:10
By: Anonymous
|
|
How many Bills has Tom introduced in his 12 years as a representative?
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility...nice to know...McClintock Bills
Posted on: 2023-05-31 08:37:07
By: Anonymous
|
|
Introduced Bills(twice) to require a 3/4 majority to raise the debt limit.
How'd that go Tom?
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility...nice to know...McClintock Bills
Posted on: 2023-05-31 08:49:56
By: Anonymous
|
|
Hey, he named a post office!
[Reply
]
|
Re: Fiscal Responsibility...nice to know...McClintock Bills
Posted on: 2023-05-31 08:59:24
By: Anonymous
|
|
Tom was banging the hell out of Merita
[Reply
]
|
Merita
Posted on: 2023-05-31 09:22:43
By: Anonymous
|
|
Sounds like you have a thing for Merita.
You keep mentioning her.
She was the best Supervisor on the Board.
[Reply
]
|
Re: Merita
Posted on: 2023-05-31 10:22:41
By: Anonymous
|
|
Fuk she was nothing but a good wine drunk
[Reply
]
|
No Subject
Posted on: 2023-05-31 08:51:28
By: Anonymous
|
|
Too bad Republicans don’t want to enforce tax laws on the ultra wealthy, that’s where the money is. Keeping a few poor people from accessing food stamps isn’t going to fix the deficit.
[Reply
]
|
|
| What's Related |
| These might interest you as well
Local News
Photo Albums
phpws Business Directory
|
|
|
