The Pine Tree, News for Calaveras County and Beyond Weather
Amador Angels Camp Arnold Bear Valley Copperopolis Murphys San Andreas Valley Springs Moke Hill/West Point Tuolumne
Business Directory
Weather & Roads
Real Estate
Weekly & Grocery Ads
Life & Style
Law Enforcement
Wine News
Health & Fitness
Home & Garden
Food & Dining
Religion & Faith
Frogtown USA
Legal Notices
Free Classifieds
Letters to the Editor
About Us

Coming Soon...
Friday, Dec 15
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
All Day Voices of Wisdom adult 55+ writing classes
06:00 PM Sip N' Paint with Artist Mary Sexton
All Day Looking Over the President's Shoulder
Saturday, Dec 16
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
All Day Voices of Wisdom adult 55+ writing classes
All Day Looking Over the President's Shoulder
07:00 PM Winter Sports History Night Honoring Mark Phillips & Ski Racing at Bear Valley is December 16th
07:00 PM Looking Over the President’s Shoulder at MCT December 1-17th
Sunday, Dec 17
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
All Day Voices of Wisdom adult 55+ writing classes
04:00 PM Symphony of the Sierra to Perform at Columbia College on December 17th
Until 02:00 PM Looking Over the President's Shoulder
07:00 PM Looking Over the President’s Shoulder at MCT December 1-17th
Monday, Dec 18
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
All Day Voices of Wisdom adult 55+ writing classes
Tuesday, Dec 19
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
01:30 PM Santa is Coming to the Arnold Library December 19th
Until 04:00 PM Voices of Wisdom adult 55+ writing classes
Wednesday, Dec 20
All Day Overeaters Anonymous meeting
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
Thursday, Dec 21
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
Friday, Dec 22
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
Saturday, Dec 23
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
Sunday, Dec 24
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
07:00 PM Christmas Eve Candlelight Worship
Monday, Dec 25
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
Tuesday, Dec 26
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
Wednesday, Dec 27
All Day Overeaters Anonymous meeting
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow
Thursday, Dec 28
All Day Yoga - Gentle Flow

Search Announcements

Log In


Remember Me

Posted by: thepinetree on 06/26/2017 05:54 PM Updated by: thepinetree on 06/26/2017 05:54 PM
Expires: 01/01/2022 12:00 AM

Sickness Unto Death Part VII: Health Care -- Right or Responsibility? ~ By John MacWillie, Ph.D.

Murphys, CA...The United States Declaration of Independence declares "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Without good health, where is the possibility for the pursuit of happiness? As the Declaration's primary author, Thomas Jefferson, would later write, "The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government." (Jefferson 1809).

This is a series of eight articles on a single theme to be released once a week.  Copyright license granted under  

For the past six weeks, we have examined the issue of health care in terms of its delivery, effectiveness, and cost. This week we turn to a much more contentious question -- the political status of health care. Is health care a fundamental right, or is it simply a privilege granted to some in society? Under what basis could health care be considered a right?

There are two categories of rights: legal rights and natural rights.

We are all familiar with legal rights. They are rights established by law. Laws passed by Congress and business contracts set forth certain kinds of rights. These kinds of rights are presumed to be valid as long as the statutory provisions remain valid or until a contract expires. For example, under the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), the right to health care is assured by statute that simultaneously enables these rights through the provision of insurance contracts between insurance companies and their customers. A customer with a pre-existing condition is guaranteed by legal rights that he or she will not be treated differently than any other customer of that insurance provider. It does not establish a rightful guarantee that insurance rates among customers in California and Alabama will be the same.

By contrast, there are natural rights. Originally, natural rights were assumed to be those rights guaranteed by a divine power, as it was assumed that everything in nature is derived from God. For example, the U.S. Declaration of Independence refers to self-evident truths that human beings are "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights". In this secular age, natural rights are more likely to be referred to as "universal rights" and are asserted by consensus in a common compact and in an appeal to common interest. The right of free speech is an example of a claim to a universal right. Universal rights, by their very name, are asserted to apply to all that are a member of a common compact and, without exception, unlimited in scope or time. Thus, the claim that there exists a right to universal health care is much stronger assertion than a contractual or statutory right and one that all persons have a right to exercise.

Is there any basis for saying that American citizens have a universal right to health care?

Consider the following interpretation.

Thomas Jefferson stated in the United States Declaration of Independence that "all men....[have natural rights including] the pursuit of happiness." Curious word, "happiness". Whatever did he mean? Surely not that everyone has the right to "feel" happy or "giddy"? Hardly.

Jefferson was a child of the Enlightenment -- the age of Reason -- when philosophers such as Locke, Rousseau, Diderot, and Montesquieu took their inspiration from the ancient world and relied on Reason as the best guide to a better, freer life. In their turn to the ancients, Jefferson, like Madison, Adams, and Hamilton observed that happiness was interpreted as the highest satisfaction one could derive from the highest goal -- virtue. For the ancients, happiness referred to the Greek word "eudaimonia" (u-dy-moh-nee-ah) which means "living well" or "flourishing".

Any examination of this nation's founding documents, including the Federalist Papers, as well as Jefferson's phrasing of the Declaration of Independence, will highlight the degree to which the founding fathers saw the kind of happiness the ancients called "flourishing" as the ultimate goal of a new nation. As George Mason, the author of Virginia's Declaration of Rights wrote, stated "All men are created equally free and independent and have certain inherent and natural rights . . . among which are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety."

But if happiness was so important to the early leaders of this country, why is there no mention of health, doctors, or medicine? First of all, health care in the eighteenth century was not much more than superstition and experimentation. To be treated by a "doctor"

The first vaccine was not discovered until 1796 by Edward Jenner; a general anesthetic (ether) was not developed until 1837; Joseph Lister didn't demonstrate antiseptics to reduce infections until the 1860's; while it wasn't until the 1870's that Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch identified bacteria as a major source of pathogens; a decade later a number of biologists isolated and grew viruses. It was not until 1928 that Alexander Fleming developed the antibiotic, penicillin. Only in the second half of the twentieth century, did biologists, pathologists, geneticists, and molecular scientists begin to unravel the enigma we call biological life. In other words, for most of this nation's history there wasn't a health care practice about which anyone would care to claim a right. It is only in this century that we have the knowledge, the capacity, and the will to offer health care for all.

So the question has to be asked: if something didn't even exist as a conceptual possibility in the eighteenth century are we limited to those concepts as the basis for asserting political rights or do we re-evaluate what the founders meant when they said the foundations of our social compact included social flourishing? Given the capacities of modern medicine to give everyone a more flourishing life, can we not begin to consider the possibilities of what happiness means in the twenty-first century?

There is a very strong argument that equal access to flourishing (which does not mean everyone will flourish) justifies the claim that healthcare is a universal right. And if it is a universal right, it is something far more exhaustive and extensive than the legal right to health care which is the standard of Obamacare.

What such an assertion that implies is taken up in next week's final article.

[To be continued]

AUTHOR: John MacWillie is a native of Calaveras County, California. He graduated from UC Berkeley where he studied European history and bio-engineering. His graduate studies include economics and urban planning at New York University and philosophy at San Francisco State. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Leeds in the U.K. He worked for ten years in law enforcement policy and administration in New York City, spent nearly thirty years as a senior executive in the software industry, primarily in information security, and for the past twelve years has been teaching in undergraduate and graduate programs at California State University -- East Bay in multimedia, art history, and criminal justice. He resides with his wife, an attorney, in Murphys CA

Comments - Make a comment
The comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for its content. We value free speech but remember this is a public forum and we hope that people would use common sense and decency. If you see an offensive comment please email us at
Posted on: 2017-06-26 19:54:17   By: Anonymous
The United States Declaration of Independence declares "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

The Declaration of Independence declares equality of opportunity for persons but not equal outcomes.
If one chooses to exercise their liberty by smoking, drinking excessively, doing recreational drugs, driving unsafe etc; it is their pursuit of happiness that brings a poor outcome to their life.
Liberty demands responsibility and it is up to the individual to take responsibility for their actions.,
You are responsible to a large extent as to your life's outcome. Screw it up and it's still yours.
Sure there are some people born with abnormal problems, that's what charity is for. Contact your church or fraternal organization.

We'd like all Americans to be healthy, but if you don't invest in your own well being, it's your fault and not mine.
The Health Care Act of 1982 guarantees you treatment at any emergency room. You want better care than that, then buy the healthcare coverage you need.
Nobody rides for free.

[Reply ]

    Re: Truth
    Posted on: 2017-06-26 20:24:15   By: Anonymous
    Well said!!!!!

    [Reply ]

      No Subject
      Posted on: 2017-06-27 02:45:18   By: Anonymous

      [Reply ]

        Posted on: 2017-06-27 10:48:21   By: Anonymous
        What amazes me is Abortion pushing Democrats supporting Euthanasia are now feigning concern for healthcare.

        Hypocrisy reigns rampant amongst the godless, babykilling socialist Democrats.

        [Reply ]

          Posted on: 2017-06-27 11:09:43   By: Anonymous
          Hmm! Let's see. It was Republican Nelson Rockefeller who signed the first abortion services law before Roe v Wade. It was Republican Mitt Romney who created first universal health law. It was Republican George Bush that provided drug coverage under Medicare and Medicaid. The Republicans around today are as Trump said "mean".

          [Reply ]

            Posted on: 2017-06-27 13:40:26   By: Anonymous

            [Reply ]

    Re: Truth
    Posted on: 2017-06-26 20:38:24   By: Anonymous
    Great! Let us send let everyone who doesn't have healthcare -- or fifty million people -- to the emergency room where it costs 7x-12x the cost of going to a clinic, thereby raising the costs of medical care for everyone by 15-20%. That is reasoning beyond comprehensibility. And we still are left with a terrible healthcare outcome -- as the author said before, we are 42nd in the world in terms of lifespan. Stand on principles if you wish, but I am too pragmatic and prefer to keep what is in my wallet to be stupid.

    [Reply ]

      Re: Truth
      Posted on: 2017-06-26 22:02:21   By: Anonymous
      No one has a right to anyone's property or labor. Healthcare can not be a right. A privilege, not a right. Words have meanings.

      [Reply ]

        Re: Truth
        Posted on: 2017-06-27 00:13:22   By: Anonymous
        Words do, in fact, have meaning. Indeed, they have force. That is why the claim that healthcare is a right, as the author infers, is important.

        [Reply ]

          Re: Truth
          Posted on: 2017-06-27 02:16:40   By: Anonymous
          If you tie it to the end of a stick, then spin around 25-30 times, then sit down, things will get better for all involved.

          [Reply ]

            Re: Truth
            Posted on: 2017-06-27 20:59:17   By: Anonymous
            That is called a Tasmanian Devil dog.

            [Reply ]

    Re: Trolls
    Posted on: 2017-06-27 03:54:44   By: Anonymous
    It's unfortunate that John Hamilton & allow trolls to deface the Comment section of this website.

    I'd love to know why they believe that this is of some public benefit.

    [Reply ]

      Re: Trolls
      Posted on: 2017-06-27 07:13:48   By: Anonymous
      I know they despises the trolls and cleans it up as quickly as they can. You either allow free speech and clean up after the messy parts or block free speech. Once you start telling people they no longer can speak then you start down a slippery slope

      [Reply ]

No Subject
Posted on: 2017-06-27 02:45:52   By: Anonymous

[Reply ]

Where are your morals????
Posted on: 2017-06-27 04:00:37   By: Anonymous
Wow. So much misinformation, downright stupidity and lack of morals In these comments.
First off, it's EMTALA which guarantees emergency medical care via hospitals, not the Declaration of Independence.
(I know reading comprehension is hard, but you may want to go back to look it over again.)
As for the lack of morals, are you seriously suggesting that, for instance, a person born with serious medical problems should just hope that their local church will cover their medical costs for life?
Newsflash for ya - that has NEVER happened.
A sick and/or seriously disabled child is sick and disabled for life. Their care can be astronomically expensive and is typically beyond what any average person can afford.
That's the whole point of Medicaid.
What do you suggest we do as society if this child's parents insurance doesn't cover all their care? Or, if they never had insurance at all?
Do we let the baby die to make a point?
The sad thing is, I'm sure the comments that follow mine will be dominated by horrible people who think we SHOULD let a sick child die.
I've lived in CC 35 years, but it seems like intelligence and a general sense of morals and character are disappearing in our community.

[Reply ]

    Re: Where are your morals????
    Posted on: 2017-06-27 15:50:22   By: Anonymous
    You should get around outside the county once in awhile or Perhaps you aren't associating with the right kind of folks.
    Haven't you ever heard of St. Judes Childrens Hospital, Mayo Clinic, Catholic Charities et al.? In California alone there are twenty charitable medical centers, such as Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford,
    Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA, Sutter Health, UC Davis and Loma Linda. Most religions are very devoted to caring for others in hugely charitable ways.
    Also the Freemasons appendant body in the USA, the Shriners, raise funds for children's hospitals and other charities. They have at least two hospitals in CA.
    The cost for treatment at these institution is often free of charge.

    Get rid of more of Obama's draconian taxes and regulations and there will be surplus money to donate to charities like these.

    [Reply ]

      Re: Where are your morals????
      Posted on: 2017-06-27 16:23:26   By: Anonymous
      Um, no. Not true at all.
      Charitable health care giving most often comes from fixed grant amounts which are quickly depleted, often, within hours of receipt.
      If a child has, say, Leukemia, their cancer cancer can run into the millions within months.
      Now multiply that by 400 kids vying for the same charitable funds.
      It is not possible to pass off chronic illness care to charity. They don't have the money to help everyone.
      Medicaid is a lifeline to these children.
      I'm horrified so many comments here seem to advocate an every- man- for-himself approach, especially since we're taking about sick and disabled children.
      What is wrong with all of you?

      [Reply ]

      Re: Where are your morals????
      Posted on: 2017-06-29 20:41:30   By: Anonymous
      What the hell are you talking about? 95% of the revenue (and a 100% for UC, Sutter, etc) come from insurance reimbursements and Federal/state aid. Charity? Please give me a break.

      [Reply ]

No Subject
Posted on: 2017-06-27 08:43:48   By: Anonymous
Cry about health dumass libs! Rather have them slowley die out than have them live off my retirment funds!

[Reply ]

What's Related
These might interest you as well
phpws Business Directory

Local News


Photo Albums

RSS News Feeds

Web Pages

Mark Twain Medical Center
Meadowmont Pharmacy
Bank of Stockton
Bear Valley Real Estate
Bear Valley Cross Country
Cedar Creek Realty
Cave, Mine & Zip Lines
Fox Security
Bistro Espresso
Pinnacle Physical Therapy
Chatom Winery
Middleton's Furniture
Bear Valley Mountain Resort
Paul D. Bertini
Premier Properties
High Country Spa & Stove

Ebbetts Pass Scenic Byway
Sierra Logging Museum
Calaveras Mentoriing
Jenny's Kitchen

Copyright © The Pine Tree 2005-2017