The Pine Tree, News for Calaveras County and Beyond Weather
Amador Angels Camp Arnold Bear Valley Copperopolis Murphys San Andreas Valley Springs Moke Hill/West Point Tuolumne
Business Directory
Weather & Roads
Real Estate
Weekly & Grocery Ads
Life & Style
Law Enforcement
Wine News
Health & Fitness
Home & Garden
Food & Dining
Religion & Faith
Frogtown USA
Legal Notices
Free Classifieds
Letters to the Editor
About Us

Coming Soon...
Saturday, Feb 23
All Day We Can Help Save Your Life with FREE Cholesterol Tests in February!
11:00 AM Town Tours of Columbia State Historic Park Every Weekend!
05:00 PM Silent Movie Night at Ironstone Vineyards - Charlie Chaplin in "The Gold Rush"
Sunday, Feb 24
All Day We Can Help Save Your Life with FREE Cholesterol Tests in February!
11:00 AM Town Tours of Columbia State Historic Park Every Weekend!
03:30 PM Cattle in the Sierra Video Presentation
Monday, Feb 25
All Day We Can Help Save Your Life with FREE Cholesterol Tests in February!
All Day Arts-In-Corrections Art Show at Columbia College Through March 28, 2019
Tuesday, Feb 26
All Day We Can Help Save Your Life with FREE Cholesterol Tests in February!
11:00 AM Next in MTMC ‘A Plan 4 Me’ Series is ‘Focus on Heart Health’ Feb. 26 & Other Events on Heart
Wednesday, Feb 27
All Day We Can Help Save Your Life with FREE Cholesterol Tests in February!
All Day Arts-In-Corrections Art Show at Columbia College Through March 28, 2019
06:30 PM Overeaters Anonymous (OA) Meeting
Thursday, Feb 28
All Day We Can Help Save Your Life with FREE Cholesterol Tests in February!
All Day Arts-In-Corrections Art Show at Columbia College Through March 28, 2019
Friday, Mar 1
All Day Arts-In-Corrections Art Show at Columbia College Through March 28, 2019
05:30 PM Friday Night Music at Alchemy
Saturday, Mar 2
10:00 AM Old Timers Museum Walking Tours Are Every Saturday at 10am.
Sunday, Mar 3
11:00 AM Town Tours of Columbia State Historic Park Every Weekend!
Monday, Mar 4
All Day Arts-In-Corrections Art Show at Columbia College Through March 28, 2019
Tuesday, Mar 5
All Day Arts-In-Corrections Art Show at Columbia College Through March 28, 2019
Wednesday, Mar 6
06:30 PM Overeaters Anonymous (OA) Meeting
Thursday, Mar 7
All Day Arts-In-Corrections Art Show at Columbia College Through March 28, 2019
Friday, Mar 8
All Day Arts-In-Corrections Art Show at Columbia College Through March 28, 2019
05:30 PM Friday Night Music at Alchemy

Search Announcements

Log In


Remember Me

Posted by: thepinetree on 05/11/2018 09:02 AM Updated by: thepinetree on 05/11/2018 09:02 AM
Expires: 01/01/2023 12:00 AM

An Endorsement of Pat Garrahan for Sheriff ~ John MacWillie, PhD

Murphys, CA...It is the obligation of every government to provide for the public safety and security of its citizens. For local jurisdictions this responsibility includes the provision of law enforcement, fire protection, and health care. In many localities, such as Calaveras County, the only direct input the public has in how these services are delivered is limited to the election of a Sheriff to manage law enforcement.

This year Calaveras County will select one of three Sheriff candidates. Given the extraordinary dysfunctionality of the current Board of Supervisors and the fact that the Sheriff’s Office represents the largest portion of the County’s discretionary budget, this just might be the most important decision voters make about the leadership of their county government.

Is one candidate better than the others? And if so, in what ways and how big a difference will that make to law enforcement services in Calaveras County?

To answer these questions, I attended several public forums in which one or more of the candidates were presenting themselves and their qualifications. I collected a range of campaign literature, newspaper articles, and TV interviews with the candidates. I also asked a sample of residents from different parts of the county to identify their most important issues regarding public safety and the degree to which they believed that any of these candidates addressed their concerns.

I have mapped these responses to what I believe are the essential qualifications for a law enforcement executive. The standards that I drew upon rely on my own experience from ten years of policy research and administration in providing advice and analysis to police commissioners, prosecutors, and agencies in major U.S. cities and with the United States Department of Justice. From that experience, I believe there are six crucial qualifications for success as a law enforcement executive: career experience, education, leadership, management skills, community engagement, and integrity. So, how do our Sheriff candidates meet those standards? And how well do they align with citizen interests? I summarize my conclusions below in the order of what I believe is an objective assessment of their qualifications.

SUMMARY: After a review of the data, public statements, and public opinion, I strongly endorse Pat Garrahan as being highly qualified to serve as Sheriff. Using the same standards, I believe that Rick Basilio is qualified (with reservations) and that Gary Stevens is unqualified. The justification for this endorsement and assessment is outlined below.


Given the information to which I had access, I consider one candidate, Pat Garrahan, as highly qualified to be the next Sheriff for Calaveras County.

• Career Experience: He served as a uniformed officer for twenty-seven years in Oakland CA and Flagstaff AZ. Moreover, he served as military policeman in the U.S. Marine Corps for four years. The breadth of his experience is reflected in his assignments to major crimes, emergency services/sniper, canine operations, and patrol units. He received more than four awards for valor or merit.

• Education: Garrahan holds a M.S. degree in criminology from Indiana State University and a B.A. in criminal justice administration from Columbia College in Columbia MO.

• Leadership: Throughout his police career, his professional experience and reputation was recognized by continually being assigned as an instructor in the Police Academy in Oakland and Flagstaff. After retiring from the Oakland Police Department, he served for four years on a knowledge transfer program for law enforcement under the auspices of the Defense Department, including deployments to Afghanistan.

• Management: Garrahan was twice promoted within the Oakland Police Department – first to Sergeant and, after three years, was promoted again to Lieutenant, during which time he served as Acting Captain and as Watch Commander in the Patrol Division.

• Community Engagement: It is my understanding that Garrahan has lived in Calaveras County for more than twenty-five years. During this time has served on a variety of community organizations as a board member or in some other leading capacity: local fire district, veterans district, Rotary Club, and the Resource Connection, as well as being a member of a wide variety of other community groups.

• Integrity: In speaking with persons who have known Garrahan for several years or more and in different capacities, all agree that his motive for running for Sheriff is his real belief that his experience and management skills can make a difference. He exemplifies a consistent career path that has been committed to law enforcement and does not appear to be seeking this position for any other reason than improving law enforcement services to the residents of Calaveras County. His policy positions are based on economic efficiency and enforcement efficacy, not political interests.

The incumbent Sheriff came to his position as the result of an appointment following the unexpected death of Sheriff Gary Kuntz. I rate Rick DiBasilio as qualified with reservations.

To be clear, it is hard not to like Rick DiBasilio. He is very affable and approachable. He is a local boy “done good” and in the absence of the leadership turmoil at the Board of Supervisors, DiBasilio would be qualified with no reservations. However, in my opinion, we need a chief law enforcement officer that has the experience, confidence, and will to stand-up to the confusion created by some Board members who inappropriately insist on meddling in the administration of county operations. In this very important sense, I am concerned that Rick is “just too nice”.

• Career Experience: Rick began his law enforcement career with the Calaveras Sheriff’s Office where he has served for nearly sixteen years. He has been promoted up through the ranks from patrol to detective to Sergeant. It was from this rank that he was selected as interim Sheriff.

• Education: DiBasilio graduated from high school in San Diego. He has completed a variety of training programs run by professional organizations and state entities.

• Leadership: Rick DiBasilio has proven to be a popular leader among his fellow Deputy Sheriff’s. Before being appointed to interim Sheriff, he was the President of the Deputy Sheriff’s Association and has received the endorsement of a broad swath of the current Sheriff’s Office staff. When he was first being considered for appointment as interim Sheriff, the existing Board of Supervisors initially was split among the candidates with two preferring DiBasilio and three other Supervisors endorsing an equal number of other candidates. It is to DiBasilio’s credit that he ultimately convinced four Board Supervisors to support his appointment.

• Management: DiBasilio served in middle management (Sergeant) in the Sheriff’s Office before his appointment to Sheriff. In considering his appearances before the current Board of Supervisors, the jury is out as to his effectiveness. He appears to rely much too frequently on his two Captains, who were his superiors before being appointed Sheriff.

• Community Engagement: Like Garrahan, DiBasilio has a long relationship with Calaveras County going back to when his father acquired the Dorrington Store in the late seventies. He has been involved in a variety of community organizations, served as a foster parent, and been actively involved in school programs in the County.

• Integrity: No one with whom I spoke could suggest any reason to doubt DiBasilio’s moral or political integrity. If he has a fault in this area, it comes out in community meetings when he refers to State laws that he claims inhibit his ability to fully enforce the laws. DiBasilio isn’t different from other law enforcement professionals in this regard, except that he seems to offer this complaint in cases where he seeks to deflect community criticism about issues unrelated to the laws with which he takes issue. This suggests that his integrity might be compromised, not by moral or political issues, but from a lack of management experience. I have confidence he could grow into meeting this challenge but worry that the incompetence of some of the Board of Supervisors might not give him the time to do so.

I consider Gary Stevens to be unqualified.

• Career Experience: Stevens has been a law enforcement officer for twenty-eight years, first with the Calaveras Sheriff’s Office, after which transferred to the Amador County Sheriff’s Office, and then, once again, began to work as an investigator for the Amador District Attorney. Unlike other candidates, he has not made the kind of institutional or career commitment that inspires confidence, but rather has moved from one job to another. This career-hopping is not assuring when it comes to being the stalwart leader of an institution such as the Sheriff’s Office.

• Education: Stevens has received three community college degrees (A.A.) in law enforcement, wildlife law enforcement, and social science.

• Leadership: His public record indicates that he is a good investigator and has been the lead investigator on an array of cases in the Amador District Attorney’s office. Indeed, Stevens was recently named Outstanding Investigator of the Year by the California District Attorney’s Association. However, most of his successes are attributed to limited engagements with small teams singularly focused on solving specific investigations. This kind of leadership success does not scale up to the challenges facing a senior executive managing larger teams, budgets, and a difficult political environment.

• Management: Stevens has no line management (middle or senior) in law enforcement. In public interviews, he defers this question to examples of his investigative leadership. He fails to understand the difference between team leadership and management leadership.

• Community Engagement: Like Garrahan and DiBasilio, Stevens lives in the west part of the county and has been active in community organizations in that part of the county.

• Integrity: Gary Stevens has acknowledged in interviews with the press that he thinks given the resources available to it, the Sheriff’s Office is doing a good job. The problem, he believes, is a deficiency of leadership. When asked to define the characteristics of this problem, he demurs. His primary target, in both policy and politics, is cannabis. In fact, taking the sum of interviews, cannabis appears to be the real reason for his run for office. I could find no mention of how he would address the much more serious plague of heroin and methamphetamines. This suggests that while he appears to have no moral integrity issues, he is likely to be seriously challenged when faced with equitably and independently addressing policy issues more complex than simply enforcing a cannabis ban.

• The basis for rating Stevens as unqualified is grounded in his lack of experience in law enforcement management, the absence of any discernible public leadership record, and serious questions about his ability to have a balanced policy approach to the administration of justice. His enthusiasm is admirable, but it is no substitute for real experience when it comes to being Sheriff of this county.
As the result of this analysis, I endorse Pat Garrahan for Calaveras County Sheriff.

John MacWillie, PhD is a native of Calaveras County, worked in law enforcement policy in New York City where he authored or co-authored monographs and papers on policing and prosecution, taught in the Criminal Justice Administration program at California State University – East Bay, and is a noted expert on surveillance and information security with work in the United States, Europe, and Asia.

Disclosure: This analysis was done without the knowledge, support, or assistance of any of the candidates. None of the candidates reviewed this document prior to its publication. The author is not associated with any of the candidates or their campaigns.

Comments - Make a comment
The comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for its content. We value free speech but remember this is a public forum and we hope that people would use common sense and decency. If you see an offensive comment please email us at
Pat Garrahan
Posted on: 2018-05-11 09:59:14   By: Anonymous
Wow John - this is excellent - nice homework

[Reply ]

    Re: Pat Garrahan
    Posted on: 2018-05-11 10:02:10   By: Anonymous
    I wonder how Stormy Daniels lawyer is getting Paid ??

    [Reply ]

      Re: Pat Garrahan
      Posted on: 2018-05-11 10:05:59   By: Anonymous
      The Clinton 2020 campaign

      [Reply ]

    Re: Pat Garrahan
    Posted on: 2018-05-11 10:10:28   By: Anonymous
    Nice summary john, thank you and completely agree. Not to also mention stevens had a reputation when working here. Some of us remember some dont, but if you looked somewhat different I say lightly he didn't treat you well. He was very hot headed at times for no apparent reason, and he seemed to enjoy it, overstepping authority. Now that's dangerous and I haven't forgotten this. NO FOR STEVENS, YES FOR PATT GARRAHAN!

    [Reply ]

      Re: Pat Garrahan
      Posted on: 2018-05-11 10:55:42   By: Anonymous
      Might be good homework. You left out a major component.
      Garrahan believes want to have Marijuana in our backyards.
      No law enforcement officer make this statement.
      NO thank you!!!

      [Reply ]

        Re: Pat Garrahan
        Posted on: 2018-05-11 11:19:13   By: Anonymous
        Incorrect. He has repeatedly said he will enforce the ban. He has also explained he is in favor of strict regualtion, which means keeping commercial grows out of residential areas. To say he is in favor of marijuana in our backyards is plain wrong.

        [Reply ]

          Re: Pat Garrahan
          Posted on: 2018-05-11 13:20:19   By: Anonymous
          Better take a solid look at Garrahans contributers!
          He is very scary in this respect.

          [Reply ]

            Re: Pat Garrahan
            Posted on: 2018-05-11 13:27:38   By: Anonymous
            To what/whom are you referring?

            [Reply ]

            Re: Pat Garrahan
            Posted on: 2018-05-11 14:47:13   By: Anonymous
            It’s all a public record so your accusation is off base and a lie.

            [Reply ]

            Re: Pat Garrahan
            Posted on: 2018-05-11 14:57:55   By: Anonymous
            Super scary that half his contributions come from his wife. Ohhhh Noooo

            [Reply ]

              Re: Pat Garrahan
              Posted on: 2018-05-12 10:01:36   By: Anonymous
              Not to mention at least he shows his campaign finance unlike the clapp, whom thinks he's above the law. And apparently his district 5 like myself aren't respected enough to make those records public to whom he serves. What a suprise right, but the hypocrite radicals that contradict themselves constantly in our community are unable to register the difference between actual honesty and integrity. Another big suprise, bias and blind by choice.

              [Reply ]

          Re: Pat Garrahan
          Posted on: 2018-05-12 17:29:30   By: Anonymous
          Saying one is in favor of strict regulation is not the same as saying grows do not belong in residential neighborhoods.

          We have regulation with the UO and the grows were in our backyard.

          [Reply ]

            Re: Pat Garrahan
            Posted on: 2018-05-12 17:58:30   By: Anonymous
            That's because the UO allowed grows in residential. Proper regulations can take it out of neighborhoods, and put it where it belongs.

            [Reply ]

No Subject
Posted on: 2018-05-11 11:10:00   By: Anonymous
Thank you for your summary. Very thoughtful. Saying that Rick Dibasilio relies on his two captains is wrong though. He relies on Captain Macedo but he simply tolerates Captain Ballard. Saying that Dibasilio is “too nice” is evident by assessing the current situation in the county jail. The staffing level is dangerously low. The officers are all overworked. Ballard has run off the majority of the officers and not simply for more pay. Some have left to other agencies but some have gone into early retirement or just left the profession all together. If Dibasilio stood up and did his job he would see past the election and the need for support and he would address the dire situation in his jail. The HR department doesn’t seem to care enough to do more than ask for more positions which can’t be filled anyway. They don’t go any further than asking Dibasilio what is wrong with the jail and he continues to blame salary. And with Dibasilio the conversation just goes back to the patrol division anyway. Hopefully community members will be ready to “adopt an inmate” soon because they will need to be housed somewhere once Ballard drives the jail to closure.
Does Garrahan have what it takes to stand up to poor leadership? If he does then he has my vote.

[Reply ]

    Posted on: 2018-05-11 11:36:06   By: Anonymous
    Candidate Stevens wife needs a new doooooo.

    [Reply ]

      Posted on: 2018-05-11 13:22:34   By: Anonymous
      Actually, Stevens wife has been so busy running the campaign and has slowly started destroying every one of the committees she serves on.
      Best like her husband or all around you are getting the nose up in the air.

      [Reply ]

      Posted on: 2018-05-12 07:05:10   By: Anonymous
      Let’s be honest, she’s too busy to do her hair because she is the actual candidate. Gary can’t tie his shoes without her.

      [Reply ]

No Subject
Posted on: 2018-05-11 13:32:32   By: Anonymous
This should be a paid advertisement, dont really care about your opinion, I have worked in LE for over 38 years, this man has nothing new to bring to Calaveras, he knows nothing about rural LE and if he really cared about local LE, he should be volunteering his time, he is already collecting a huge public retirement with benefuts. Also you should state that Garrahan is collecting $147,600.00 + in his yearly retirenent, that includes at least a 2% increase every year, talk about double dipping from the public... DeBasilio or Stevens are better qualified and neither will be double ripping the public off....

[Reply ]

    Posted on: 2018-05-12 07:12:03   By: Anonymous
    Is there a maximum salary or accumulation of wealth allowed here in Calaveras? It seems to me that whatever anyone’s retirement package is, should be of no concern to you. It seems to me that many people in this county are against other’s becoming successful. Lord knows, most people commute out of county because they won’t aettlw for the paltry salaries offered around here. College graduates have nothing to come home to and that’s why they leave and don’t come back until retirement. I’m guessing that you’re jealous and make way less and will never get to retire.

    [Reply ]

      Posted on: 2018-05-12 10:24:17   By: Anonymous
      This is our problem in calaveras. Just look at the comments, we are no longer allowed an opinion. We are no longer allowed to be freely who we are, what we are or what we may look like as its become a complete stereotype. Why are we allowing it to get this bad? It was bad before but jesus h Christ everyone has different views, the lot of you really need to put on your big boy pants and grow up. The world is not flat, change has happened in california whether you like it or not. That's just common sense, either live with it or move on. As for the repeated prop 64 didn't pass here, well trump also had the most votes here doesn't that say it all? This is about what's best for the community and I agree with this summary. Thanks john
      R Garner

      [Reply ]

        Posted on: 2018-05-13 17:04:53   By: Anonymous
        For your info Mr. Garner the state leaves the options of cultivation or no cultivation etc. up to the counties or cities. So it's up to Calaveras County or Angels Camp whatever way they want to go. They (powers that be) I imagine could shut down dispensaries too. Look at all the problems that they are already having in Sacramento County.

        [Reply ]

          Posted on: 2018-05-14 17:26:01   By: Anonymous
          Firstly, I am not a man. And why would you just assume this. Well because you are sexist. Thanks for proving another point. You live in california, you cannot control that. Regardless of what a city enforces marijuana is legal state wide. Someone still has the right to grow marijuana per person and smoke it freely in whatever city, your city ban or no ban. A tourist can still have marijuana personally inside their pocket, bag, hotel room ect in even the town you reside. There is nothing absolutely nothing you can do about that. So quit crying, get with reality maybe find a new hobby, something else to be obsessed and angry about because you are wasting your time and everyone elses. You've grown tired, whoever you are. Mrs steven r smith I assume. Some advice take it easy, go with change or move if you can't stand the majority of our state. The minority is you now.

          [Reply ]

            Posted on: 2018-05-14 17:38:36   By: Anonymous
            One more thing, Mrs sexist. What did your response even have to do with what I wrote? I wasn't even writing about cultivating marijuana commercial or personal, only that it's a reality in the state. You know a point that change exists and we all have an opinion which hasn't been respected in these parts. I know all about what cities and counties can adapt lawly when it comes to commercial cultivation, you are so off topic it stinks. Complainer alert. Reading comprehension class can help if you chose to actually have an intelligent discussion someday, falling flat, sour and empty. That's all your words are.
            R Garner

            [Reply ]

              Posted on: 2018-05-14 17:50:21   By: Anonymous
              It's gotta be poor old stevie. With the powers that be reference, all biblical and shi.t, then anal cramps been brought into the mix. Creep is a dead give away. And he wants to know everyone buisness, what's in your pocket, where you from, who are you, not in my town, ain't gonna fly cry cry cry baby. Oh and let's not forget his fear of a glory hole. Old fashioned man with ending every comment with LOL. In stevie land everything is funny just like being adolescent. That means being a child steven. FYI

              [Reply ]

      Posted on: 2018-05-12 14:27:18   By: Anonymous

      [Reply ]

        Posted on: 2018-05-14 17:40:06   By: Anonymous
        ^Double dipping retard

        [Reply ]

What's Related
These might interest you as well

Photo Albums

Local News

phpws Business Directory

Web Pages

Mark Twain Medical Center
Meadowmont Pharmacy
Bank of Stockton
Bear Valley Real Estate
Bear Valley Cross Country
Cedar Creek Realty
Cave, Mine & Zip Lines
Fox Security
Bistro Espresso
Pinnacle Physical Therapy
Chatom Winery
Middleton's Furniture
Bear Valley Mountain Resort
Paul D. Bertini
Premier Properties
High Country Spa & Stove
Calaveras Mentoriing

Ebbetts Pass Scenic Byway
Sierra Logging Museum
Jenny's Kitchen

Copyright © The Pine Tree 2005-2018