Weather
The Pine Tree, News for Calaveras County and Beyond Weather
Amador Angels Camp Arnold Bear Valley Copperopolis Murphys San Andreas Valley Springs Moke Hill/West Point Tuolumne
News
Business Directory
Weather & Roads
Sports
Real Estate
Search
Weekly & Grocery Ads
Entertainment
Life & Style
Government
Law Enforcement
Business
Wine News
Health & Fitness
Home & Garden
Food & Dining
Religion & Faith
Frogtown USA
Legal Notices
Calendar
Polls
Columns
Free Classifieds
Letters to the Editor
Obituaries
About Us

Coming Soon...
Wednesday, Sep 20
All Day Overeaters Anonymous meeting
06:00 PM Rep. Tom McClintock Announces Town Hall Meeting in Angels Camp on September 20th
Friday, Sep 22
06:00 PM State of Law Enforcement in Calaveras Co Hosted by FOCSO
07:00 PM Music At Bistro Espresso
Saturday, Sep 23
All Day The Big, The Ginormous Annual Winter Ski Sale at CHS Thrift
All Day The 21st Annual Ironstone Concours d' Elegance is September 23rd
09:00 AM Are You Ready? Emergency Preparedness Fair is September 23rd!
03:30 PM Humane Society of Tuolumne County's Whiskers, Wags, and Wine Tasting Event
04:00 PM Community Action Project Fall Equinox Fundraiser
05:00 PM Spaghetti Dinner & Bingo
Sunday, Sep 24
All Day The Big, The Ginormous Annual Winter Ski Sale at CHS Thrift
08:00 AM 4th Annual Angels Camp Gold Run
08:00 AM Register Now for the 4th Annual Angels Camp Gold Run on September 24th
10:00 AM The Farmers Market At The Square is Back Every Sunday Till October
Tuesday, Sep 26
09:00 AM "Voices of Wisdom" Adult Writing Classes
10:00 AM Marisolio Tasting Bar - Middle Eastern Medley Cooking Class
04:30 PM Freedom From Smoking Class Begins in August
Wednesday, Sep 27
All Day Overeaters Anonymous meeting
Friday, Sep 29
07:00 PM Music At Bistro Espresso
Saturday, Sep 30
09:30 AM Calaveras Genealogical Society's DNA Workshop
05:00 PM Moon Bash Demolition Derby Coming to Calaveras County Family Fun and Hard-Hitting Action will be a F
Sunday, Oct 1
10:00 AM The Farmers Market At The Square is Back Every Sunday Till October
Monday, Oct 2
10:00 AM VA Health Van Coming to Valley Springs October 2nd
Tuesday, Oct 3
04:30 PM Freedom From Smoking Class Begins in August

Search Announcements




Log In
Username

Password

Remember Me



Posted by: thepinetree on 02/26/2015 11:03 AM Updated by: thepinetree on 02/26/2015 11:16 AM
Expires: 01/01/2020 12:00 AM
:



FCC Adopts Internet Rules Without Prior Public Disclosure

Washington, D.C. – Ending lingering uncertainty about the future of the Open Internet, the Federal Communications Commission today set sustainable rules of the roads that will protect free expression and innovation on the Internet and promote investment in the nation’s broadband networks. The FCC has long been committed to protecting and promoting an Internet that nurtures freedom of speech and expression, supports innovation and commerce, and incentivizes expansion and investment by America’s broadband providers. But the agency’s attempts to implement enforceable, sustainable rules to protect the Open Internet have been twice struck down by the courts....





Today, the Commission—once and for all—enacts strong, sustainable rules, grounded in multiple sources of legal authority, to ensure that Americans reap the economic, social, and civic benefits of an Open Internet today and into the future. These new rules are guided by three principles: America’s broadband networks must be fast, fair and open—principles shared by the overwhelming majority of the nearly 4 million commenters who participated in the FCC’s Open Internet proceeding.

Absent action by the FCC, Internet openness is at risk, as recognized by the very court that struck down the FCC’s 2010 Open Internet rules last year in Verizon v. FCC.

Broadband providers have economic incentives that “represent a threat to Internet openness and could act in ways that would ultimately inhibit the speed and extent of future broadband deployment,” as affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The court upheld the Commission’s finding that Internet openness drives a “virtuous cycle” in which innovations at the edges of the network enhance consumer demand, leading to expanded investments in broadband infrastructure that, in turn, spark new innovations at the edge.

However, the court observed that nearly 15 years ago, the Commission constrained its ability to protect against threats to the open Internet by a regulatory classification of broadband that precluded use of statutory protections that historically ensured the openness of telephone networks. The Order finds that the nature of broadband Internet access service has not only changed since that initial classification decision, but that broadband providers have even more incentives to interfere with Internet openness today. To respond to this changed landscape, the new Open Internet Order restores the FCC’s legal authority to fully address threats to openness on today’s networks by following a template for sustainability laid out in the D.C. Circuit Opinion itself, including reclassification of broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act.

With a firm legal foundation established, the Order sets three “bright-line” rules of the road for behavior known to harm the Open Internet, adopts an additional, flexible standard to future-proof Internet openness rules, and protects mobile broadband users with the full array of Open Internet rules. It does so while preserving incentives for investment and innovation by broadband providers by affording them an even more tailored version of the light-touch regulatory treatment that fostered tremendous growth in the mobile wireless industry.

Following are the key provisions and rules of the FCC’s Open Internet Order:

New Rules to Protect an Open Internet

While the FCC’s 2010 Open Internet rules had limited applicability to mobile broadband, the new rules—in their entirety—would apply to fixed and mobile broadband alike, recognizing advances in technology and the growing significance of wireless broadband access in recent years (while recognizing the importance of reasonable network management and its specific application to mobile and unlicensed Wi-Fi networks). The Order protects consumers no matter how they access the Internet, whether on a desktop computer or a mobile device.

Bright Line Rules: The first three rules ban practices that are known to harm the Open Internet:

No Blocking: broadband providers may not block access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.

No Throttling: broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.

No Paid Prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind—in other words, no “fast lanes.” This rule also bans ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.

The bright-line rules against blocking and throttling will prohibit harmful practices that target specific applications or classes of applications. And the ban on paid prioritization ensures that there will be no fast lanes.

A Standard for Future Conduct: Because the Internet is always growing and changing, there must be a known standard by which to address any concerns that arise with new practices. The Order establishes that ISPs cannot “unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage” the ability of consumers to select, access, and use the lawful content, applications, services, or devices of their choosing; or of edge providers to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to consumers. Today’s Order ensures that the Commission will have authority to address questionable practices on a case-by-case basis, and provides guidance in the form of factors on how the Commission will apply the standard in practice.

Greater Transparency: The rules described above will restore the tools necessary to address specific conduct by broadband providers that might harm the Open Internet. But the Order recognizes the critical role of transparency in a well-functioning broadband ecosystem. In addition to the existing transparency rule, which was not struck down by the court, the Order requires that broadband providers disclose, in a consistent format, promotional rates, fees and surcharges and data caps. Disclosures must also include packet loss as a measure of network performance, and provide notice of network management practices that can affect service. To further consider the concerns of small ISPs, the Order adopts a temporary exemption from the transparency enhancements for fixed and mobile providers with 100,000 or fewer subscribers, and delegates authority to our Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau to determine whether to retain the exception and, if so, at what level.
The Order also creates for all providers a “safe harbor” process for the format and nature of the required disclosure to consumers, which the Commission believes will lead to more effective presentation of consumer-focused information by broadband providers.
Reasonable Network Management: For the purposes of the rules, other than paid prioritization, an ISP may engage in reasonable network management. This recognizes the need of broadband providers to manage the technical and engineering aspects of their networks.
In assessing reasonable network management, the Commission’s standard takes account of the particular engineering attributes of the technology involved—whether it be fiber, DSL, cable, unlicensed Wi-Fi, mobile, or another network medium.
However, the network practice must be primarily used for and tailored to achieving a legitimate network management—and not business—purpose. For example, a provider can’t cite reasonable network management to justify reneging on its promise to supply a customer with “unlimited” data.

Broad Protection
Some data services do not go over the public Internet, and therefore are not “broadband Internet access” services (VoIP from a cable system is an example, as is a dedicated heart-monitoring service). The Order ensures that these services do not undermine the effectiveness of the Open Internet rules. Moreover, all broadband providers’ transparency disclosures will continue to cover any offering of such non-Internet access data services—ensuring that the public and the Commission can keep a close eye on any tactics that could undermine the Open Internet rules.

Interconnection: New Authority to Address Concerns
For the first time the Commission can address issues that may arise in the exchange of traffic between mass-market broadband providers and other networks and services. Under the authority provided by the Order, the Commission can hear complaints and take appropriate enforcement action if it determines the interconnection activities of ISPs are not just and reasonable.
Legal Authority: Reclassifying Broadband Internet Access under Title II
The Order provides the strongest possible legal foundation for the Open Internet rules by relying on multiple sources of authority including both Title II of the Communications Act and Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. At the same time, the Order refrains – or forbears – from enforcing 27 provisions of Title II and over 700 associated regulations that are not relevant to modern broadband service. Together Title II and Section 706 support clear rules of the road, providing the certainty needed for innovators and investors, and the competitive choices and freedom demanded by consumers, while not burdening broadband providers with anachronistic utility-style regulations such as rate regulation, tariffs or network sharing requirements.
First, the Order reclassifies “broadband Internet access service”—that’s the retail broadband service Americans buy from cable, phone, and wireless providers—as a telecommunications service under Title II. This decision is fundamentally a factual one. It recognizes that today broadband Internet access service is understood by the public as a transmission platform through which consumers can access third-party content, applications, and services of their choosing. Reclassification of broadband Internet access service also addresses any limitations that past classification decisions placed on the ability to adopt strong open Internet rules, as interpreted by the D.C. Circuit in the Verizon case. And it supports the Commission’s authority to address interconnection disputes on a case-by-case basis, because the promise to consumers that they will be able to travel the Internet encompasses the duty to make the necessary arrangements that allow consumers to use the Internet as they wish.

Second, the proposal finds further grounding in Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Notably, the Verizon court held that Section 706 is an independent grant of authority to the Commission that supports adoption of Open Internet rules. Using it here—without the limitations of the common carriage prohibition that flowed from earlier the “information service” classification—bolsters the Commission’s authority.
Third, the Order’s provisions on mobile broadband also are based on Title III of the Communications Act. The Order finds that mobile broadband access service is best viewed as a commercial mobile service or its functional equivalent.

Forbearance: A modernized, light-touch approach
Congress requires the FCC to refrain from enforcing – forbear from – provisions of the Communications Act that are not in the public interest. The Order applies some key provisions of Title II, and forbears from most others. Indeed, the Order ensures that some 27 provisions of Title II and over 700 regulations adopted under Title II will not apply to broadband. There is no need for any further proceedings before the forbearance is adopted. The proposed Order would apply fewer sections of Title II than have applied to mobile voice networks for over twenty years.
Major Provisions of Title II that the Order WILL APPLY:
The proposed Order applies “core” provisions of Title II: Sections 201 and 202 (e.g., no unjust or unreasonable practices or discrimination)
Allows investigation of consumer complaints under section 208 and related enforcement provisions, specifically sections 206, 207, 209, 216 and 217
Protects consumer privacy under Section 222
Ensures fair access to poles and conduits under Section 224, which would boost the deployment of new broadband networks
Protects people with disabilities under Sections 225 and 255
Bolsters universal service fund support for broadband service in the future through partial application of Section 254.
Major Provisions Subject to Forbearance:
Rate regulation: the Order makes clear that broadband providers shall not be subject to utility-style rate regulation, including rate regulation, tariffs, and last-mile unbundling.
Universal Service Contributions: the Order DOES NOT require broadband providers to contribute to the Universal Service Fund under Section 254. The question of how best to fund the nation’s universal service programs is being considered in a separate, unrelated proceeding that was already underway.
Broadband service will remain exempt from state and local taxation under the Internet Tax Freedom Act. This law, recently renewed by Congress and signed by the President, bans state and local taxation on Internet access regardless of its FCC regulatory classification.
Effective Enforcement
The FCC will enforce the Open Internet rules through investigation and processing of formal and informal complaints
Enforcement advisories, advisory opinions and a newly-created ombudsman will provide guidance
The Enforcement Bureau can request objective written opinions on technical matters from outside technical organizations, industry standards-setting bodies and other organizations.
Fostering Investment and Competition
All of this can be accomplished while encouraging investment in broadband networks. To preserve incentives for broadband operators to invest in their networks, the Order will modernize Title II using the forbearance authority granted to the Commission by Congress—tailoring the application of Title II for the 21st century, encouraging Internet Service Providers to invest in the networks on which Americans increasingly rely.
The Order forbears from applying utility-style rate regulation, including rate regulation or tariffs, last-mile unbundling, and burdensome administrative filing requirements or accounting standards.
Mobile voice services have been regulated under a similar light-touch Title II approach, and investment and usage boomed.
Investment analysts have concluded that Title II with appropriate forbearance is unlikely to have any negative on the value or future profitability of broadband providers. Providers such as Sprint, Frontier, as well as representatives of hundreds of smaller carriers that have voluntarily adopted Title II regulation, have likewise said that a light-touch, Title II classification of broadband will not depress investment.
Action by the Commission February 26, 2015, by Report and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order (FCC 15-24). Chairman Wheeler, Commissioners Clyburn and Rosenworcel with Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly dissenting. Chairman Wheeler, Commissioners Clyburn, Rosenworcel, Pai and O’Rielly issuing statements.
Docket No.: 14-28


Comments - Make a comment
The comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for its content. We value free speech but remember this is a public forum and we hope that people would use common sense and decency. If you see an offensive comment please email us at news@thepinetree.net
Hold your wallet tight
Posted on: 2015-02-26 13:16:18   By: Anonymous
 
Well we just allowed the internet to become just another revenue source for the Government and a tool to be used against friends and fooes. All you government lovers will applaud this action and you really believe it is needed regulatory control. Time will ultimately tell but I do know the cost will go up now that Government has the ability to tax the service.

[Reply ]

    GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
    Posted on: 2015-02-26 17:20:10   By: Anonymous
     
    There was frantic lobbing by many Republicans to hand the Internet to the broadband companies, who would throttle for price, and content.

    The Net Neutrality issue was about keeping the internet a free equal access to all utility.

    The Republicans never want to keep the public commons equal to all.Their privatization zeal has been a boon for the wealthy, and a bane to most people.

    The Republicans are representatives of the $Billionaires, and $Millionaires.
    Are you one?, if not, you really should take a look at what the results of Republican policies cost you.


    [Reply ]

      BELIEVE WHAT YOU WISH
      Posted on: 2015-02-26 17:46:29   By: Anonymous
       
      Any meddling by the government cannot be good, and takes us one more step to Socialism, or whatever Mr. Obama titles it today.

      I'd rather have private industry have their hands in it than anybody from the taking a whack at it, literally.

      [Reply ]

        Re: BELIEVE WHAT YOU WISH
        Posted on: 2015-02-26 20:50:37   By: Anonymous
         
        Learn how to create a local network using your home desktop or lap top as a Hot Spot/Gateway for others and also learn how to create your Mobile Device into a Mobile Hot Spot for others to pass through. All of the plans are available by a simple web search. Just because the bigger Internet gets shut down does not mean the local intranets will shut down. All is people with the proper knowledge and servers using WiFi to create a local Intranet. Ask those kids in Cuba how they did it right under the eyes of their oppressive government. When the government outlaws the internet then only outlaws will be using it still freely exchanging information.

        [Reply ]

          Re: BELIEVE WHAT YOU WISH
          Posted on: 2015-02-26 21:33:02   By: Anonymous
           
          and ask Cuba about their booming economy.

          Just like electricity and telephones our culture has finally realized the internet is nothing more than a utility. How do you think other countries handle their internet service?

          [Reply ]

        Re: BELIEVE WHAT YOU WISH
        Posted on: 2015-02-26 21:31:31   By: Anonymous
         
        The Government meddles in the electricity I am provided with for my home and business and for electricity provided to schools!! Horrors!

        Fearful much? You are way too afraid of everything. Lookout! That's your shadow right next to you. Be afraid!


        [Reply ]

        Re: BELIEVE WHAT YOU WISH
        Posted on: 2015-02-27 10:39:38   By: Anonymous
         
        Yeah, I don't like government to be meddling in stuff. It is socialism. They should not meddle in airplanes and airports, cars or trucks, electricity or telephones. For sure they should not meddle in banks, or food makers. I mean, if someone wants to sell dogmeat in their beef hotdogs, don't buy it. Plus some people like dog meat. And government shouldn't meddle in health care, because that is socialism. If people want to be a doctor they should be a doctor and if you don't like it, go somewhere else. And if someone wants to sell sugar pills as a cure for cancer they should be able to do it. Let the free market control it. Let private enterprise do what they want. People need to look out for themselves, I don't care who you are, old, children, sick, starving- that is better than socialism.

        [Reply ]

        Re: BELIEVE WHAT YOU WISH
        Posted on: 2015-03-01 15:32:35   By: Anonymous
         
        4 million people submitted comments to the FCC urging them to keep Net Neutrality. The FCC passed rules. They don't tell what the rules are until they have a majority of the Commission in support of proposed rules. Then they adopt the rules. Now if someone doesn't like it they can ask for changes or a stay of the rule. If that fails they can take it to court.

        If you didn't comment before they adopted rules it is because you did not pay attention to the issue. Big business lobbied the Commission big time before the rules were adopted. It has been going on for years.







        f

        [Reply ]

      Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
      Posted on: 2015-02-27 09:50:12   By: Anonymous
       
      If Republicans are all about millionaires and billionaires, or the so-called 1%, then why do presidential elections come so close to 50-50%? Why are there so many Republicans in America's heartland where incomes may be relatively modest but so many Democrats in the major cities where incomes tend to be higher?
      Do you think Republicans are selfish? Stupid? There is another possibility. Perhaps they like freedom, personal responsibility, respect for life, and when it comes to money, they believe that everybody should earn their own. Oh, and charity. Republicans are far more generous than Democrats.

      [Reply ]

        Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
        Posted on: 2015-02-27 09:58:21   By: Anonymous
         
        And why have the new rules not been fully disclosed?


        [Reply ]

          Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
          Posted on: 2015-02-28 18:32:34   By: Anonymous
           
          The rules have been disclosed you just didn't keep up on it.

          [Reply ]

            Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
            Posted on: 2015-03-01 12:35:05   By: Anonymous
             
            It's hard to keep up on something that was kept secret until after they passed it - over 300 pages.

            [Reply ]

              Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
              Posted on: 2015-03-01 20:19:48   By: Anonymous
               
              You could have voiced your opinion BEFORE they passed the rules if you had been aware of the issues and taken the time to do it. I did. I emailed, like 4 million other Americans, asking them to keep the Net Neutral. Those that don't like it still have a chance to change it. But you are wrong to think that it was some kind of conspiracy or government overreaching. This discussion has been going on for years. And those that don't like it have the opportunity to appeal or file a lawsuit.

              [Reply ]

        Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
        Posted on: 2015-02-27 19:49:05   By: Anonymous
         
        Why are they screwing around with homeland security?

        [Reply ]

          Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
          Posted on: 2015-03-01 12:33:36   By: Anonymous
           
          They're not, Obama is.

          [Reply ]

            Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
            Posted on: 2015-03-01 14:42:32   By: Anonymous
             
            Really, don't fund all national security because you disagree with part of it? Gramma had a saying, that's throwing the baby out with the bath water, Grampa used to say don't cut off your nose to spite your face.

            It is totally absurd to threaten to cancel all homeland security because you don't like some immigration issues.

            Its the same horsecrap as shutting down the government over Obamacare or anything else.

            [Reply ]

              Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
              Posted on: 2015-03-01 15:54:51   By: Anonymous
               
              Yep, there are peaceful and reasonable ways to try to change rules, regulations and laws. If it is bad it will be corrected.

              [Reply ]

              Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
              Posted on: 2015-03-01 19:42:11   By: Anonymous
               
              The republicans want to fund DHS except the funding for Obama's illegal immigration. It is the dems who want to "shut down" DHS. Not funding DHS will not "shut it down". 85% of DHS employees are deemed "essential" and are required to show up to work. I wish you people would get a clue.

              [Reply ]

                Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
                Posted on: 2015-03-01 20:46:26   By: Anonymous
                 
                Required to show up for work, but not get paid unless Congress approves it later. Tthat has the way it has been in the past.

                [Reply ]

                  Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
                  Posted on: 2015-03-02 09:25:12   By: Anonymous
                   
                  All the Dems have to do is fund DHS, without funding Obama's unlawful illegal immigration fiasco. Problem solved.

                  [Reply ]

                    Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
                    Posted on: 2015-03-02 17:43:48   By: Anonymous
                     
                    Dems are the minority, they cannot do as you say. Like always, give the the GOP something they want, they move the goal post.

                    [Reply ]

                      Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
                      Posted on: 2015-03-02 18:01:36   By: Anonymous
                       
                      How did they move the goal post?

                      [Reply ]

                Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
                Posted on: 2015-03-01 21:02:49   By: Anonymous
                 
                Take your own advice. After the shutdown in 2013 the DHS employees got back pay, but get this, the private contractors did not! You like that?

                [Reply ]

                Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
                Posted on: 2015-03-01 21:08:52   By: Anonymous
                 
                So DHS people are working without a guarantee that they will get a paycheck to pay their mortgage or car payment. And private contractors may not get paid. And you like that ? You want people who have important jobs protecting the country to be worried about paying their bills, worried about stuff for their kids, worried about the spouse who is complaining about being broke?

                Think it through.

                [Reply ]

        Re: GOP Opposed Net Neutrality
        Posted on: 2015-02-28 08:04:20   By: Anonymous
         
        Very few people vote. 36% of eligible voters voted in the last election. So 18% of the voting population isn't some overwhelming message from the public.

        [Reply ]

    Re: Hold your wallet tight
    Posted on: 2015-02-28 14:47:53   By: Anonymous
     
    History lesson - the internet as it is today was created by government programs to share data between agencies and colleges most notably ARPANet and MilNet. A good deal of the action recently is more toward protecting the free access infrastructure of the internet than allowing private interests to establish "toll roads" and limit access to it,.

    [Reply ]

    Re: Hold your wallet tight
    Posted on: 2015-02-28 19:14:24   By: Anonymous
     
    I would rather have open internet required by the government than have big business tell me what I could google, when and for how much if I want it quicker.

    [Reply ]

    Re: Hold your wallet tight
    Posted on: 2015-03-01 17:30:00   By: Anonymous
     
    More revenue for the government is a problem for you? You don't like what the government provides for you, your family, the community, the state, and the entire nation? Maybe you should move where government doesn't provide anything.



    [Reply ]

    Re: Hold your wallet tight
    Posted on: 2015-03-01 18:41:50   By: Anonymous
     
    Of course it needs regulatory control. Without controls making it Net Neutral, free content, that equates to free speech, not what some corporation wants to limit or charge you for. Think this through. What if phone companies controlled who you could talk to or what you could say, or charged you more for calling a particular phone number.

    [Reply ]

No Subject
Posted on: 2015-02-26 21:44:58   By: Anonymous
 
Great, more government regulation. This country has gone to total crap.

[Reply ]

    Re:
    Posted on: 2015-02-27 07:43:18   By: Anonymous
     
    if you dont love it, leave it!

    [Reply ]

      Re:
      Posted on: 2015-02-27 09:12:16   By: Anonymous
       
      Well Obama doesn't love it but unfortunately it doesn't look like he is leaving.

      [Reply ]

        Re:
        Posted on: 2015-02-27 19:47:57   By: Anonymous
         
        So, then you should. Where would you go? Mexico, India, Syria.? Good goddam luck!

        [Reply ]

          Re:
          Posted on: 2015-03-01 10:38:59   By: Anonymous
           
          No reason to go to Mexico. We're becoming Mexico, except they have consequences for illegal immigrants.

          [Reply ]

            Re:
            Posted on: 2015-03-01 13:10:48   By: Anonymous
             
            We ain't becoming Mexico, this is still the USofA!

            [Reply ]

    Re:
    Posted on: 2015-02-28 19:18:03   By: Anonymous
     
    No it has not gone to crap. If the government allowed big international business to regulate the internet for you, that would really be crap.

    [Reply ]

      Re:
      Posted on: 2015-03-01 12:38:52   By: Anonymous
       
      Crap is allowing the government to keep 300 pages of regulations secret until it passes, with no public knowledge of what was in it, nor no public input. That is crap. You want Big Brother government, well here you go!

      [Reply ]

        Re:
        Posted on: 2015-03-01 14:57:47   By: Anonymous
         
        Don't be afraid. Any rules adopted by the FCC comittee now become public and have to approved after public review and comment.

        [Reply ]

        Re:
        Posted on: 2015-03-01 18:46:10   By: Anonymous
         
        People and business that object to the rules can lobby to change them, or seek laws in Congress, or go to the courts. If you try not to be reactionary, you might see this is a good thing intended to allow freedom of speech and freedom of access on the internet.

        [Reply ]

No Subject
Posted on: 2015-02-26 23:19:08   By: Anonymous
 
All I know is darn Obama is trying to take my guns and Internet a way.

[Reply ]

    Re:
    Posted on: 2015-02-27 02:53:07   By: Anonymous
     
    Gloop ^^

    [Reply ]

      Re:
      Posted on: 2015-02-27 07:35:30   By: Anonymous
       
      www.americanthinker.com/.../obama_administration_to_ban_bullets_ar15_ targeted.html‎

      [Reply ]

        Re:
        Posted on: 2015-02-27 07:42:51   By: Anonymous
         
        idiot^

        [Reply ]

          Re:
          Posted on: 2015-02-27 20:05:44   By: Anonymous
           
          ^ look in the mirror, Sparky.

          [Reply ]

            Re:
            Posted on: 2015-02-28 07:48:23   By: Anonymous
             
            if you think obama will take away your bullets, you are a world class idiot.

            [Reply ]

              Re:
              Posted on: 2015-02-28 18:33:57   By: Anonymous
               
              uh, yup, you nailed it.

              [Reply ]

Scared silly
Posted on: 2015-03-01 20:23:51   By: Anonymous
 
Sure is a bunch of people on this board, scared ailly, because they don't understand how this ruling will protect their access to freedom of speech and freedom of association and freedom to read and post what and where they want.

If you are scared silly, go ahead and through some BS at us.

[Reply ]

    Re: Scared silly
    Posted on: 2015-03-01 20:24:44   By: Anonymous
     
    typos: silly, throw.

    [Reply ]


What's Related
These might interest you as well
Photo Albums

Local News

Calendar

phpws Business Directory

Web Pages

RSS News Feeds


Mark Twain Medical Center
Meadowmont Pharmacy
Century 21 Sierra Properties
Bear Valley Real Estate
Bear Valley Cross Country
Cedar Creek Realty
Cave, Mine & Zip Lines
Fox Security
Bistro Espresso
Pinnacle Physical Therapy
Chatom Winery
Middleton's Furniture
Bear Valley Mountain Resort
Paul D. Bertini
Premier Properties
High Country Spa & Stove

Ebbetts Pass Scenic Byway
Sierra Logging Museum
Calaveras Mentoriing
Jenny's Kitchen




Copyright © The Pine Tree 2005-2017